🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.