🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.